The High Court of Judicature at Patna orally dismissed a criminal appeal seeking to quash an order rejecting a prayer for anticipatory bail. The appeal was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the appellants. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4444 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2017 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, SPP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Hence, this appeal against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail by order dated 30.03.2019 passed in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.375 of 2017 by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Mkr./-
U T
Monu Singh@Monu Kumar Singh and others
The State of Bihar
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
