Allowed

Parameshvar Prasad @ Prameshvar Prasad @ Rameshvar Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Dec 2020CR. APP (SJ)/329/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in a criminal appeal under the SC/ST Act, allowed the appeal against refusal of anticipatory bail. The court set aside the lower court's order and granted bail to the appellant.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; appeals allowed; anticipatory bail granted with bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties on conditions under S. 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Parameshvar Prasad @ Prameshvar Prasad @ Rameshvar Prasad Vs… — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.329 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2017 Thana- INARWA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PARAMESHVAR PRASAD @ PRAMESHVAR PRASAD @ RAMESHVAR PRASAD Son of Late - Jagarnath Prasad Resident of Village - Kesariya, P.S. - Shikarpur, District - West Champaran.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Md. Anis Akhtar, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Special P.P. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 14-12-2020

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶12

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'SC/ST Act') against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail vide order dated 20.12.2019 passed by learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (SC/ST/POCSO Act), West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Inarwa P.S. Case No. 73 of 2017 registered under Sections 341, 323, 354, & 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and

¶13

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.329 of 2020(2) dt.14-12-2020 2/3

¶14

Section ¾ of the Prevention of Witch Act.

¶15

When the informant was regressing to his house after cutting grass, appellant along with other accused persons intercepted her and slating her in the name of caste, tore her attire and dragged holding her hair and also assaulted her by means of slaps and fists and dubbed her as daain.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has no concern with the aforesaid occurrence. He has been falsely implicated in the case due to dirty village politics and previous enmity. The prosecution party is in habit of lodging false case against the appellant in which police has submitted final form. Informant has not sustained injury in the occurrence. The allegation levelled against the appellant is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is delay of two days in lodging the F.I.R. without assigning any plausible explanation for the said delay. Appellant has no criminal antecedent. Similarly situated co-accused has granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.10.2019 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.4278 of 2019.

¶17

Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶18

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.329 of 2020(2) dt.14-12-2020 3/3

¶20

above named appellant, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1^st Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, SC/ST/POCSO, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Inarwa P.S. Case No.73 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal is allowed.

¶22

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶23

Trivedi/-

¶24

U T

Parameshvar Prasad @ Prameshvar Prasad @ Rameshvar Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parameshvar Prasad @ Prameshvar Prasad @ Rameshvar Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Suraj Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Manohar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Agarwal @ Sanjay Agarwal @ Sanjay Vs the State of Bihar

Randhir Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar