Allowed

Raju Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Dec 2020CR. APP (SJ)/1348/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against rejection of bail in a murder and SC/ST Atrocities case. The court granted bail to the appellant, citing lack of trial progress and bail to a co-accused, imposing conditions including cooperation and residence sureties.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount; conditions include cooperation with trial, local sureties, and no leaving the country without permission.

Raju Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1348 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2019 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raju Choudhary, aged about 45 years (Male), son of Late Doman Choudhary, Resident of Village - Satnag, Police Station - Chandi, District - Nalanda

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan ======================================================

¶7

... ... Respondent/s

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 01-12-2020

¶10

Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sadanand Paswan, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State through video conferencing.

¶11

The present appeal is directed against the order dated 05.03.2020 passed by learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge – cum- Special Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 69 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 302 / 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3 (2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act by which the regular bail of the appellant has been rejected.

¶12

The allegation as per First Information Report is that appellant along with other named accused persons took the brother of the informant with them and the dead body of the victim was found on 23.02.2019 which was hanging from a tree.

¶13

This is 2^nd attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the appellant inasmuch earlier the prayer for bail of the appellant was rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 3158 of 2019 dated 21.10.2019.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1348 of 2020(3) dt.01-12-2020 2/3

¶15

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and the co-accused / Vijendra Chaudhary has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 3391 of 2019 (Annexure 4 to this memo of appeal).

¶16

This court had called for a report vide order dated 09.10.2020 regarding the present stage of the trial from the learned trial court and the same has been furnished by learned I/c Addl. Sessions Judge - 1^st -cum- Spl. Judge (SC / ST Act) Nalanda at Biharsharif dated 20^th October, 2020. From perusal of the report it appears that cognizance of the offences after submission of charge sheet was taken on 11.06.2019 and 08 charge sheet witnesses are there. It appears that none of the witnesses has been examined up till now whereas the appellant is in custody since 25.02.2019.

¶17

Having regard to the submission made by the parties and taking into consideration the materials available on record and the fact that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail and trial has not registered any progress after framing of charge, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the appellant.

¶18

Accordingly, let the appellant, above named, be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1348 of 2020(3) dt.01-12-2020 3/3

¶20

(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge -cumSpecial Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 69 of 2019 on the following conditions:-

¶21

(a) that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation / trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

¶22

(b) that both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

¶23

(c) the appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.

¶24

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bond all the parties shall follow the guidelines regarding social distancing.

¶25

praful/-

¶26

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

U T

Raju Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Badal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Tiwari Vs the State of Bihar

Awadhesh Kumar Jaiswal Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Choudhary @ Pankaj Kr. Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar