This is a review of an order disposing of a writ petition seeking directions for fund payment to a college. The High Court described the main application as 'thoroughly misconceived' and the order as without opinion. The review was dismissed.
The review application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.496 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11334 of 2016
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bajarangi Lal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey Aag 15
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
which is quoted below:-
“Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the University and the learned counsel appearing for the State.
The petitioner has filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to
Patna High Court C. REV. No.496 of 2018(5) dt.28-03-2019 2/3
make payment of rupees one lakh out of the fund allocated by the State Government.
In fact, with regard to the College, in question, in C.W.J.C. No. 6366 of 2014 a coordinate Bench of this Court has considered various aspects of the matter and noticing the vigilance enquiry in relation to use, misuse and abuse of the fund issued specific direction on 08.11.2017 with regard to payment and operation of the account.
In view of the above, no further order is needed to be passed. The interest of the petitioner stands protected under the order, dated 08.11.2017, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6336 of 2014 and, as such, the Court is not required to pass further order.
This writ application stands disposed of in the light of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6336 of 2014, dated 08.11.2017.”
This Court without giving any opinion disposed of the writ application in the light of the order passed in C.W.J.C. no. 6336 of 2014 which was passed in relation to the same institution.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.496 of 2018(5) dt.28-03-2019 3/3
The present application has been filed for review of the order dated 07.02.2018 which is thoroughly misconceived. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
T.Kr./- U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition challenging the order dated 07.02.2018, which disposed of the original writ application without merits, is maintainable.
The Convener, Ad Hoc Committee, Birchand Patel Smarak College and Ors
Lal Babu Singh and Ors
The State of Bihar
The B.R.A. Bihar University
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
