The Patna High Court dismissed two review petitions filed against First Appeals as they were barred by limitation. The Court refused to condone the delay in filing the review petitions.
Both review petitions were dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.408 of 2016
In
First Appeal No.47 of 1968
Patna High Court C. REV. No.408 of 2016 dt.13-02-2019 2/3
19 to 23 are residents of village - Marui, Pargana - Roh, PS - Nawada, District - Gaya now Nawada. ---Plaintiffs/Respondents/Opposite 4th Party.
======================================================
with
Civil Review No. 409 of 2016 In
First Appeal No.46 of 1968
======================================================
District - Gaya now Nawada. Defendants/Respondents/Petitioner/s Versus
Patna High Court C. REV. No.408 of 2016 dt.13-02-2019 3/3
======================================================
Appearance : (In Civil Review No. 408 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravindra Kr Sinha No.2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (In Civil Review No. 409 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravindra Kr Sinha No.2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 13-02-2019
Both the review petitions have been filed to review the Judgment dated 17.5.2016 passed by this Hon’ble Court in First Appeal No. 46 of 1968 along with First Appeal No. 47 of 1968.
I.A. Nos. 7503 of 2016 and 7504 of 2016 have been filed on behalf of petitioners making prayer to condone the delay in filing the review petitions against both the Appeals.
This Court after looking into the facts as mentioned in the Interlocutory Applications, is not satisfied, with the reason mentioned therein, to condone the delay.
Therefore, both the review petitions are dismissed as barred by limitation.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
S.Ali/-
| AFR/NAFR |
NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE |
N.A. |
| Uploading Date |
18/02/2019 |
| Transmission Date |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing review petitions against First Appeals can be condoned.
Munshi Sao @ Munshi Lal Gupta and others
Smt. Rukmini Devi and others
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
