Single judge oral order disposing of miscellaneous application. The court noted the impugned writ order was complied with and held no further indulgence was required, aggregating the pending matter.
Application disposed of as no further indulgence is required after compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.702 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5483 of 2013
======================================================
Satya Narayan Ram, son of Late Gulab Chand Ram, Resident of Village - Narayanpur, Police Station - Navtan, District - Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
6 to 9 are residents of Village - Narayanpur, Police Station - Navtan, District - Siwan.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam - Aag12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 19-02-2019 Considering the fact that the order of the writ Court is
complied with, no further indulgence is required in the matter.
Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uday/-
U
Satya Narayan Ram
The State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
