The petitioner withdrew the contempt petition following the passing of a reasoned order by the concerned authority but was granted liberty to challenge said order.
Contempt petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the reasoned order of the concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.65 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17905 of 2017
======================================================
Suminta Devi Wife of Tarun Kumar, Resident of Village- Telari Tola, Kashibigha, Block and P.S. Nimchak, Bathani, District- Gaya. ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the concerned authority has passed a reasoned order in compliance of the order of this Court, disobedience whereof has been complained of in the present contempt petition, hence the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition, however liberty may be granted to challenge the aforesaid reasoned order.
Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands disposed off as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
rinkee/- U
Suminta Devi
The State Of Bihar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
