Disposed

Sudarshan Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Dec 2019MJC/4736/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a contempt application alleging deliberate disobedience of a prior High Court judgment. The court found the earlier directions were fully complied with. Consequently, the contempt application was treated as infructuous and disposed of without initiating proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The petition for contempt and punishment for disobedience of the prior judgment was dismissed as infructuous.

Sudarshan Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4736 of 2018

¶2

¶3

Letters Patent Appeal No.894 of 2018

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Sudarshan Ram, Son of Late Ram Nagina Ram, resident of C/5, Saket Bihar, Mitra Mandal Colony, Anisabad, Police Station Anisabad, District- Patna.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Sri Binay Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶10

Sri Sanjay Kumar, the Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

¶11

Dr. Nilotpal Gosawami, the Accountant General Accounts and Entitlement, Bihar, Patna, Birchand Pat

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rupak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore – AG For the Accountant General: Mr. L. P. K. Rajgrihar, Advocate

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶17

and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶18

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶19

2 17-12-2019

¶20

This petition instituted on 28.11.2018 has come up

¶21

for hearing today.

¶22

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-

¶23

“It is, therefore, prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit this contempt application, issue show cause notice as to why contempt proceeding be not initiated against the opposite parties for their willful and deliberate disobedience of judgement

¶24

Patna High Court MJC No.4736 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2019 2/2

¶25

dated 13.08.2018 and after receipt of the show cause and after hearing the parties be further pleased to punish the opposite parties for willful and deliberate disobedience of judgement dated 13.08.2018 passed in L.P.A. No.894 of 2018 and pass such other order or orders as your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the ends of justice.”

¶26

Undisputedly, the directions contained in the judgement dated 13.08.2018 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.894 of 2018, titled as Sudarshan Ram Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. stands complied with.

¶27

As such, no case of contempt is made out.

¶28

The present contempt application stands disposed of as infructuous.

¶29

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶30

( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶31

Sunil/-

¶32

Sudarshan Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudarshan Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Divya Kumari @ Nisha Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Sanjeev Kumar Mishra Vs The High Court of Judicature at Patna

Upendra Chandra Vs The State of Bihar

Babita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Upendra Ram Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Mr. R. K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govern

Sundar Kant Vidyarthi Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.