Allowed

M/s Heena Garments Through Its Prop Minhajul Ekram Farog @ Minhajul Ekram v. The Authorized Officer, State Bank India, R B O, Gaya and Ors.

Patna HC17 Jul 2019MJC/4238/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed miscellaneous application seeking restoration of a filed writ petition dismissed for non-compliance. The High Court allowed the restoration and disposed of the miscellaneous application.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6580 of 2018 to its original file; disposal of Misc. Case No.4238 of 2018.

M/s Heena Garments Through Its Prop Minhajul Ekram… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4238 of 2018

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6580 of 2018

¶4

======================================================

¶5

M/s Heena Garments Through Its Prop Minhajul Ekram Farog @ Minhajul Ekram S/o Md. Ekram, R/o Dr. Lalita Babu Road near Urdu Library, Muhalla- Baratpur, District Aurangabad and Vill- Duari, Post- Dugul, P.S.Kasma, Dist- Aurangabad.

¶6

... ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Authorized Officer, State Bank India, R B O, Gaya

¶9

The Regional Manager, SBI, Gaya Main Branch, 3rd Floor, Gaya.

¶10

The Chief Manager (RBO), SBI, Branch Aurangabad, Dist- Gaya.

¶11

The Circle Officer, Land and Revenue Department, Circle-Aurangabad, Dist- Aurangabad.

¶12

Mr. Chandan Kumar Singh, S/o Banarsi Singh, R/o Urdu Tola, ThanaBigha, Dist- Aurangabad.

¶13

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Dept, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

¶14

... ... Opposite Parties

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mrs. Usha Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG 12 For the S.B.I. : Mr. Kaushlendra Kr. Sinha, Advocate ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

Date : 17-07-2019

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the opposite parties.

¶19

This application has been filed for restoration of CWJC No. 6580 of 2018 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 16.04.2018.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that owing to unavoidable circumstances, peremptory order dated 16.04.2018 passed in CWJC No. 6580 of 2018 could not be complied within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶21

For the reasons stated in the restoration petition, the

¶22

Patna High Court MJC No.4238 of 2018 dt.17-07-2019 2/2

¶23

prayer for restoration is allowed and CWJC No. 6580 of 2018 is restored to its original file.

¶24

MJC No. 4238 of 2018 stands disposed of.

¶25

Office to proceed accordingly.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to serve a

¶27

copy of this petition on learned counsel for the State Bank of India by Friday (19.07.2019).

¶28

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶29

BT/-

¶30

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	19.07.2019
Transmission Date	N.A.

M/s Heena Garments Through Its Prop Minhajul Ekram Farog @ Minhajul Ekram v. The Authorized Officer, State Bank India, R B O, Gaya and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Heena Garments Through Its Prop Minhajul Ekram Farog @ Minhajul Ekram v. The Authorized Officer, State Bank India, R B O, Gaya and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ataul @ Mohammad Ataul @ Ataur Rahman Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Thakur @ Anmol Harsh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Secretary Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old Secretariat

Krishna Sah and Anr. Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Sikandar Singh @ Sikendar Singh Vs The State of Bihar