Disposed

Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Arun Kumar Singh, The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Water Resources De

Patna HC17 Jul 2019MJC/3254/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition for contempt proceedings filed against respondents for alleged willful disobedience of a prior judgment, accepting the submission that the judgment was complied with via a final decision dated 11.06.2019.

What did the court decide?

The MJC disposal granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 11.06.2019 before an appropriate forum if aggrieved.

Urmila Devi Vs The State Of Bihar Through Sri Arun Kumar… — Contempt of Court | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3254 of 2017 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5656 of 2008

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Urmila Devi W/o Late Bhuneshwar Sharma, Resident of VillageSundarpur, P.O.- Baha Chowki, P.S.- Dharhara, District- Munger.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through Sri Arun Kumar Singh, the Commissioner Cum Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Sri Sachida Nand Singh, the Managing Director, Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd. (an undertaking Unit of Govt. of Bihar), Patna.

¶9

Sri Rama Shankar Prasad, Daftuar, the Director Welfare Department, ICDS Directorate, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Smt. Savitri Das, the Child Development Project Officer, Warsaliganj, District- Nawadah.

¶11

... ... Opposite Parties

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties: Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG- 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-07-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

counsel for the opposite parties.

¶15

The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the judgment of this Court dated 02.08.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5656 of 2008.

¶16

Third supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 3 whereof being an order dated 11.06.2019 passed by the Director, ICDS, discloses that a final

¶17

Patna High Court MJC No.3254 of 2017 dt.17-07-2019 2/2

¶18

decision has been taken by the authorities and thus it is submitted that the judgment of this Court stands complied with.

¶19

In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 3254 of 2017 stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 11.06.2019 rejecting the claim of the petitioner that in case she is aggrieved by the order of the authorities as noticed above, she may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised.

¶20

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶21

Ibrar/BT

¶22

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	22.07.2019
Transmission Date	N.A.

Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Arun Kumar Singh, The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Water Resources De

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Arun Kumar Singh, The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Water Resources De

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ataul @ Mohammad Ataul @ Ataur Rahman Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Thakur @ Anmol Harsh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Secretary Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old Secretariat

Krishna Sah and Anr. Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Sikandar Singh @ Sikendar Singh Vs The State of Bihar