The High Court at Patna dismissed the writ petition by ordering the proceedings to be dropped and disposed of, holding that the direction of the writ court had been complied with, making no further indulgence necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2323 of 2018
======================================================
Sadhu Sharan Prasad son of Shri Kameshwar Prasad, resident of VillageDasturpur, P.S. Tharthari, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Shilpa Singh - Ga 12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
4 07-02-2019 Considering the fact that the direction of the writ
court has been complied with, no further indulgence is required. The present proceeding is dropped and the application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Sadhu Sharan Prasad
The State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
