The High Court of Patna disposed of the continuation application dropped as opposite parties complied with earlier directions, granting liberty to challenge the final decision separately.
Continuation application dropped; liberty granted to challenge compliance decision in appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.165 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.417 of 2018
======================================================
Anjum Ara Begam, Wife of Sheraj Ansari, Resident of Village- Masadhi, P.O.- Deohalia, P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Kaimur………...... ... Petitioner/s Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukul Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Smt. Shilpa Singh
======================================================
the order in compliance of the direction issued by this Court, no further indulgence is required, present proceeding is dropped.
However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the decision of the opposite parties in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid liberty the present application stands disposed of.
T.Kr./- U
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Anjum Ara Begam
The State Of Bihar
Arvind Kumar Verma
Nawal Kishore Choudhary
Kameshwar Kanti
Niraj Kumar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
