Disposed

Upendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Feb 2019MJC/1518/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A short order disposing of a pending miscellaneous application following compliance with a previous writ direction. The court noted that the competent authority had passed an order, and the petitioner was granted liberty to challenge it if required.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the opposite parties dated 22.01.2019.

Upendra Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1518 of 2018

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19081 of 2016

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Upendra Prasad Yadav Son of Late Narayan Yadav resident of Village - Litiyahi, P.O. Dinapatti, P.S. Pipra, District Supaul.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Bihar.

¶9

Sri Arbind Kumar Verma Son of not known The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Sri Baid Nath Yadav Son of not known The District Magistrate, Supaul.

¶11

Sri Amar Bhushan Prasad Son of not known The District Magistrate, Supaul.

¶12

Sri Sheo Shankar Rai Son of not known The District Education Officer, Supaul.

¶13

Sri Shambhu Kamat Son of not known The District Treasury Officer, Supaul.

¶14

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shree Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shrimati Shilpa Singh, GA-12

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶20

3 04-02-2019

¶21

This Court while disposing of the writ application on

¶22

01.03.2017, directed the District Programme Officer, Supaul to examine all aspects to the matter and take appropriate decision.

¶23

Learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of

¶24

opposite parties submits that in compliance of the direction issued by the writ Court, the Director, Primary Education has passed order on 22.01.2019 vide Annexure-N to the show cause.

¶25

Considering the fact that the direction was only to take appropriate decision and in compliance of the same, the Director, Primary Education has taken decision contained in Annexure-N to the show cause, no indulgence is required in the

¶26

Patna High Court MJC No.1518 of 2018(3) dt.04-02-2019 2/2

¶27

present case. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the validity of the decision of the opposite parties dated 22.01.2019 vide Annexure-N to the show cause in accordance with law.

¶28

With the aforesaid, the present application stands disposed of.

¶29

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶30

mdrashid/-

¶31

Upendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamad Junain @ Md. Junain Vs State of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Zahid @ Chhotu Vs The State Of Bihar

Ganesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Ehsan Ahmad Vs Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh Presently Posted As Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar and Ors.

Shravan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar