Oral order disposing of a miscellaneous application. The court held that no further action was required based on a supplementary show cause statement, granting liberty to file an affidavit for revival if the benefit was not restored.
None; liberty to file affidavit for revival of proceedings if benefit not restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1494 of 2014
======================================================
Anima Kumari D/o Sri Praphul Ranjan Majumdar Resident of Village P.S. Bhabanipur, District Purnia at present working as an assistant teacher in middle school Khanjanchi Hat Sadar, P.S. Sadar Purnia, District Purnia.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr.Kundan Bhadur Singh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
5 17-01-2019 Having regard to the statements made in paragraph No. 7 of the supplementary show cause, no further action is required in the present proceeding. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file affidavit for revival of the present proceeding in the event the benefit has not yet been restored to her.
With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Anima Kumari
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
