Dismissed

Ramayan Mahto, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Dec 2019MJC/1103/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought initiation of contempt proceedings for non-compliance with an order directing the State Government to frame technical guidelines and recruit Amins. The matter was dismissed in default as the petitioner failed to appear.

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceedings initiated against respondents for failure to comply with earlier order regarding survey guidelines.

Ramayan Mahto, Vs The State of Bihar — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1103 of 2019

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1868 of 2018

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Ramayan Mahto, Son of Late Chanchal Mahto, Resident of Village- Cheriya Bariyarpur, P.O.- Shreepur, Police Station- Cheriya Bariyarpur, DistrictBegusarai.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through Brijesh Mehrotra the Principal Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Anupam Kumar the Secretary, Chief Minister Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Virendra Kumar Mishra the Additional Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

Jai Singh the Director, Land Record and Survey, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶12

Subodh Kumar the Special Work Officer, Land Record and Survey, Directorate of Land Record and Survey, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶13

Rahul Kumar the District Magistrate/Collector cum District Survey and Settlement Officer, Begusarai.

¶14

Om Prakash Prasad the District Consolidation Officer, Begusarai.

¶15

Om Prakash Prasad the Additional Collector, Begusarai.

¶16

Sanjeev Kumar Chaudhary the Sub Divisional Officer, Begusarai Sadar, District- Begusarai.

¶17

Durgesh Kumar the Sub Divisional Officer, Manjhaul, District- Begusarai.

¶18

Sudhir Kumar the Sub Divisional Officer, Bakhari, District- Begusarai.

¶19

Nishant the Sub Divisional Officer, Teghara, District- Begusarai.

¶20

Uttam Kumar the Sub Divisional Officer, Balia, District- Begusarai.

¶21

Rajiv Ranjan Chakrawarti the Circle Officer, Cheriya Bariyarpur, DistrictBegusarai.

¶22

Subodh Kumar the Circle Officer, Khodawandpur, District- Begusarai.

¶23

Sumant Nath the Circle Officer, Chhaurahi, District- Begusarai.

¶24

Prem Kumar Sharma the Circle Officer, Gadhpura, District- Begusarai.

¶25

Krishana Mohan Kumar the Circle Officer, Bakhari, District- Begusarai.

¶26

Rajendra Kumar Rajiv the Circle Officer, Nawkothi, District- Begusarai.

¶27

Utpal Himvan the Circle Officer, Begusarai, District- Begusarai.

¶28

Ajay Raj the Circle Officer, Barauni, District- Begusarai.

¶29

Naveen Kumar Chaudhary the Circle Officer, Birpur, District- Begusarai.

¶30

Upendra Kumar the Circle Officer, Matihani, District- Begusarai.

¶31

Patna High Court MJC No.1103 of 2019(4) dt.19-12-2019 2/3

¶32

Rajaram Keshari the Circle Officer, Samho, District- Begusarai.

¶33

Aditya Vikram the Circle Officer, Teghara, District- Begusarai.

¶34

Amar Kumar Rai, the Circle Officer, Mansoorchak, District- Begusarai.

¶35

Kumar Nalini Kant the Circle Officer, Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai.

¶36

Suraj Kant the Circle Officer, Bachhwara, District- Begusarai.

¶37

Amrit Raj Bandhu the Circle Officer, Balia, District- Begusarai.

¶38

Jai Krishana Prasad the Circle Officer, Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai.

¶39

Ritesh Verma the Circle Officer, Dandari, District- Begusarai.

¶40

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶41

====================================================== Appearance :

¶42

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag12)

¶43

======================================================

¶44

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶45

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶46

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶47

4 19-12-2019 The petitioner has prayed for the following relief:

¶48

“For initiation of contempt of court proceeding against the opposite parties for their willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 17.09.2018 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWJC No. 1868 of 2018 whereby the Court has disposed of the present writ application by directing the State Government or Director, Land Records to frame and publish the technical guidelines as per Rule 21 of the Rules, 2012 within a period of six weeks from today and, thereafter, the State Government shall recruit the required number of “Amins” as defined under Rule 2(xi) of 2011 Act to carry out the work of survey and settlement as per the Act, 2011 and Rules, 2012

¶49

Patna High Court MJC No.1103 of 2019(4) dt.19-12-2019 3/3

¶50

at the earliest so that the work of survey and settlement, for which the Act, 2011 has been enacted, is completed in the State of Bihar by the State of Bihar within the time prescribed by the committee. According to the minutes of the meeting held on 04.06.2018, the State Government is directed to see that the work of survey and settlement under the Act 2011 is completed at the earliest. It is further submitted that after lapses of more than 6 weeks the petitioner reiterated the observation/direction made in order dated 17.09.2018 passed in CWJC No. 1868 of 2018 by this Court to the respondents/ Opposite Parties no. 1 to 8 through registered post on 27.11.2018 but no consequence thereon.

¶51

Despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of

¶52

the petitioner.

¶53

Accordingly, the present application is dismissed in

¶54

default.

¶55

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶56

( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶57

sujit/-

¶58

Ramayan Mahto, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramayan Mahto, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Praveen Peter Shah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Shri Anjani Kumar, Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Abadhesh Kumar Keshri @ Abadhesh Kumar Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Mahanth Ram Kamal Das @ Mahata Ram Kamal Das Vs The Chairman, Bihar State Board Of Religious Trust and Anr.

Tarannum Naz and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.