In a civil miscellaneous application, the Patna High Court dismissed the plea for want of prosecution as the appellant did not appear. Interim stay was vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim stay vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1618 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 2
and 6 to 8 is present.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1618 of 2017(3) dt.30-08-2019 2/2
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
The interim stay granted by this Court vide order
dated 14.09.2018 stands vacated.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Pradeep/-
U
Ram Prasad Sah
Shukdeo Sah
AWASHANI KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
