Disposed

Dipesh Raj @ Deepesh Raj v. Khushbu Kumari

Patna HC8 Mar 2019MA/880/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appellant court allowed an appeal filed against an interlocutory custody order. Relying on settled precedent, it permitted the appellant to file an application under Article 227 of the Constitution to question the Family Court's order instead of adjudicating the appeal itself.

What did the court decide?

Appellant permitted to move appropriate forum to question the Family Court order under Article 227 of the Constitution.

Dipesh Raj @ Deepesh Raj Vs Khushbu Kumari — Child Custody and Guardianship | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.880 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dipesh Raj @ Deepesh Raj, Son of Mahesh Sah, Resident of Village – Mathura Uttar, Ward No. 09, P.S. - Narpatganj, District - Araria

¶4

... ... Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

Khushbu Kumari wife of Deepesh Raj, Daughter of Binod Sah, Resident of Station Chowk Forbesganj, Ward No. 11, P.S. - Forbesganj, District - Araria

¶7

... ... Respondent

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and

¶11

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶12

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶13

5 08-03-2019

¶14

Perused the office objection which informs that the appeal has been filed against the interlocutory order passed by the Family Court, Araria, in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in so far as it orders for custody of the minor child in favour of the respondent.

¶15

Learned Counsel for the appellant while accepting the position in view of the legal position settled by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Nilam Kumari Sinha Versus Shree

¶16

Prashant Kumar, reported in (2010)3 PLJR 632, wherein it has been held that the interlocutory order has to be questioned by filing an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeks liberty to file appropriate application.

¶17

Patna High Court MA No.880 of 2018(5) dt.08-03-2019 2/2

¶18

In such view of the matter, while disposing of the appeal we permit the petitioner to move the appropriate forum, if so advised, to question the order passed by the Family Court which is impugned herein.

¶19

Ordered accordingly.

¶20

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶21

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶22

Archana/ Surendra/-

¶23

Dipesh Raj @ Deepesh Raj v. Khushbu Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipesh Raj @ Deepesh Raj v. Khushbu Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Kaushal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Murli Paswan Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.