Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ application. Railways consented. Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
None; the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9738 of 2019
======================================================
R. K. Impex Pvt. Ltd. a company having one of it's offices at Adarsh Nagar, Birgunj-13, Nepal-44301, through Shri Arun Kumar Rai male aged about 40 years son of Late Sohan Rai, resident of Ward no. 20, Mouza Raxaul, East Champaran (Bihar), resident of ward no. 20, Mouza Raxaul, East Champaran (Bihar) 845305
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.(Standing Counsel Railway), Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
permission to withdraw this writ application.
Learned counsel for the Railways has no objection to
the same.
The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
vats/ved
U
R. K. Impex Pvt. Ltd.
The Union of India
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
