Allowed

Himanshu Kumar Verma @ Himanshu kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jul 2019CWJC/9701/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition seeking provisional release of a motorcycle seized for excise offences. The court directed release upon submission of ownership documents, two sureties, and specific undertakings within 14 days.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of the vehicle directed upon submission of ownership, sureties, and required undertakings within 14 days.

Himanshu Kumar Verma @ Himanshu kumar Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9701 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Himanshu Kumar Verma @ Himanshu kumar Son of Pradeep Kumar verma. R/o-Bangali Tola, Near Ram Janaki Mandir, P.S. Buxar (Town), DistrictBuxar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Prohibition Excise and Registration Department, Government of Bihar.

¶7

The Excise Commissioner, Prohibition Excise and Registration Department, Government of Bihar.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Buxar.

¶9

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Buxar.

¶11

The Officer in Charge, Buxar (Town), Police Station, Buxar.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vivek Prasad ( Gp7)

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICEPARTHA SARTHY)

¶16

Date : 23-07-2019

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶18

The petitioner is owner of TVS Apache Motorcycle and prays for provisional release of his vehicle bearing registration No. BR44K1883, Engine No. BE4GJ2628872, Chassis No. MD634BE43J2G30878, which has been seized in connection withBuxar (Town) P.S. Case No. 253 of 2019 for the offences punishable under sections 30(a) and 37(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.9701 of 2019 dt.23-07-2019 2/3

¶20

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list supports the seizure of the motorcycle and 360 ml. of IMFL.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated court below with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/ undertakings:

¶22

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

¶23

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.9701 of 2019 dt.23-07-2019 3/3

¶25

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

¶26

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared by the designated court below wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

¶27

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding, if any.

¶28

With the observations above, this writ petition is

¶29

allowed.

¶30

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶31

( Partha Sarthy, J)

¶32

sushma/-

¶33

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	03.08.19
Transmission Date	NA

Himanshu Kumar Verma @ Himanshu kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himanshu Kumar Verma @ Himanshu kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Teklal Nayak Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mohammad Ali Ebran Vs The State of Bihar

Sant Sagar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shanti Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanyog Construction Private Limited Vs The State of Bihar