Disposed

Kritayanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC10 Jan 2019CWJC/7673/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of multiple connected writ petitions as infructuous, relying on agreement that final orders had been passed elsewhere, granting liberty to raise issues in pending proceedings; one unrelated petition was delinked. Quality: thin.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed as infructuous with liberty to raise issues in pending proceedings; C.W.J.C. No. 5179 of 2016 delinked from the present set.

Kritayanand Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3529 of 2016

¶2

====================================================== Babli Devi

¶3

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5179 of 2016 ====================================================== Awadesh Kumar @ Awadesh Kumar Singh and Anr ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Dhirendra Kumar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3917 of 2016 ====================================================== Dhananjay Kumar Suri ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3681 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Merajuddin ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3662 of 2016 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Saha

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶5

Patna High Court CWJC No.3529 of 2016(14) dt.10-01-2019 2/7

¶6

... ... Respondent/s

¶7

====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18398 of 2015 ====================================================== Harendra Kumar Singh ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7880 of 2017 ====================================================== Saif Ali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3842 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Rafik ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3734 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Ismail

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶9

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3795 of 2016 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Saha @ Santosh Kumar Sah

¶12

Patna High Court CWJC No.3529 of 2016(14) dt.10-01-2019 3/7

¶13

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5993 of 2016 ====================================================== Sunil Sarkar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3867 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Rauf ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3653 of 2016 ====================================================== Vishal Prakash ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3670 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Parvej ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with

¶14

Patna High Court CWJC No.3529 of 2016(14) dt.10-01-2019 4/7

¶15

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3682 of 2016

¶16

======================================================

Mohan Singh

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶21

... ... Respondent/s

¶22

======================================================

¶23

with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7673 of 2017 ====================================================== Kritayanand Yadav

¶24

... ... Petitioner/s

¶25

Versus

¶26

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶27

... ... Respondent/s

¶28

====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5180 of 2018 ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Saha

¶29

... ... Petitioner/s

¶30

Versus

¶31

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶32

... ... Respondent/s

¶33

====================================================== Appearance : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3529 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5179 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad For the Respondent/s : Mr. (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3917 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3681 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3662 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18398 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7880 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh

¶34

Patna High Court CWJC No.3529 of 2016(14) dt.10-01-2019 5/7

¶35

For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag 1 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3842 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3734 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3795 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5993 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3867 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3653 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3670 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3682 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7673 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar- Sc11 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5180 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha -Ga1

¶36

======================================================

¶37

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and

¶38

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶39

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶40

14 10-01-2019

¶41

A counter affidavit is being filed in C.W.J.C. No. 3529 of 2016 by Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned S.C.-11 which in terms of our order already passed would cover the cases of the other analogous writ petitions as well.

¶42

Mr. Sanjay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in all the cases prays for short accommodation

¶43

Patna High Court CWJC No.3529 of 2016(14) dt.10-01-2019 6/7

¶44

to examine the same and file rejoinder, if so adviced.

¶45

List these matters on 17.01.2019 under the same

¶46

heading.

¶47

Re: C.W.J.C. No. 7673 of 2017

¶48

: C.W.J.C. No. 5180 of 2018 : C.W.J.C. No. 7880 of 2017

¶49

Mr. Sanjay Singh, learned counsel appears for

¶50

the petitioners along with Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate on record and the State is represented by Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned S.C.-11.

¶51

Parties are in agreement that by passage of time, the issue has become infructuous as final order has been passed in the proceedings and the petitioners have also taken recourse to the remedy so available to them under the statute.

¶52

In view of the position noticed, the writ petitions are disposed as infructuous affording liberty to the petitioners to raise all issues as raised herein alongwith other issues in the pending proceeding.

¶53

Re: C.W.J.C. No. 5179 of 2016

¶54

None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶55

This Court notices that C.W.J.C. No. 5179 of 2016

¶56

Patna High Court CWJC No.3529 of 2016(14) dt.10-01-2019 7/7

¶57

was wrongly listed along with other cases on 03.01.2019 and since a general order was passed by this Court requiring an affidavit to the writ petitions, the said matter has again been listed whereas it transpires that C.W.J.C. No. 5179 of 2016 is not connected with the issue raised in the other writ petitions.

¶58

Accordingly, C.W.J.C. No. 5179 of 2016, which is also listed today, is delinked from the present set of cases.

¶59

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶60

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶61

Brajesh/- U

Kritayanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kritayanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and Anr. Vs Ramanuj Sanskrit Uchcha Vidyalaya and Ors.

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and Anr. Vs Sidhnath Shankar Sanskrit Prathmik Vidyalaya and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Saraswati Bhawan Jai Kant Madhyamik Sanskrit Vidyalaya and Ors.

Ramesh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Saha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Awadh Kishore Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.