Disposed

Arbind Kumar Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jul 2019CWJC/7395/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court nullified a recovery order from petitioner's pension and gratuity as respondents did not seek enforcement. Court directed release of G.P.F. and outstanding pension/gratuity amounts within 8 weeks under threat of salary deduction for authorities failing compliance.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of recovery order; direction to release G.P.F. and pension/gratuity within 8 weeks on pain of salary deduction for defaulting officers.

Arbind Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7395 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Arbind Kumar Sinha Son of Late Lalan Prasad Sinha Resident of MohallaM.I. Lane Pathar Gali Saristabad, P.S.-Gardanibadh, District-Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department Bihar, Patna Vishveshraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶8

The Engineer in Chief, Road Construction Department Bihar, Patna, Vishveshraiya Bhawan Baily Road, Patna.

¶9

The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction, Department, Bihar, Patna, Vishvershraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶10

The Executive Engineer National High Way Division Gulzarbagh, Patna behind Police Radio, Rajbanshi Nagar, P.S.-Shastri Nagar, Patna.

¶11

The Treasury Officer, Vishveshraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶12

The General Provident Fund Officer Paant Bhawan, Patna.

¶13

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Ballav Prasad Yadav (Aag11) : Archana For A.G. : Manish Kumar ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶17

4 08-07-2019 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing

¶18

the order of recovery which has been directed to be made from the pension and gratuity amount of the petitioner herein vide order dated 20.02.2019 contained in memo no. 341 as also payment of a part of G.P.F. amount which pertains to the period 08.04.1981 to 30.06.1983.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the

¶20

respondent- State submits that the respondents are not seeking

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.7395 of 2019(4) dt.08-07-2019 2/3

¶22

to enforce the aforesaid order of recovery dated 20.02.2019, hence to the said extent, the petitioner should not have any grievance, any more.

¶23

This Court appreciates the fair approach of the respondent- State and declares that since the respondents are not seeking to recover any amount, the aforesaid order dated 20.02.2019 stands null and void.

¶24

As far as the G.P.F. amount for the period 08.04.1981 to 30.06.1983 is concerned, the respondent- State has stated in its counter affidavit that the same pertains to the period when the petitioner was working with the work charge establishment under the National Highway, Dehri Division and a request has already been made to the Executive Engineer, National High Way Division, Gulzarbagh, Patna for taking necessary action.

¶25

In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for release of the balance amount of G.P.F. payable to the petitioner herein within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, failing which the Execuive Engineer, National High Way Division, Gulzarbagh, Patna shall not draw his salary. This Court would also take penal action for non-compliance of its

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.7395 of 2019(4) dt.08-07-2019 3/3

¶27

order. It goes without saying that the outstanding amount of pension/ gratuity, which has already been sanctioned and sent to the Treasury Officer, Vishveshraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna, shall also be paid to the petitioner herein within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, failing which the said Treasury Officer shall not draw his salary.

¶28

The present writ petition stands disposed off with the aforesaid directions.

¶29

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶30

rinkee/-

¶31

Arbind Kumar Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nand Kishore Prasad Raja Yadav Alias Nand Kishore Sudhanshu Vs The State Of Bihar (and Ors)

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Paras Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shivaji Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.