Petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition as the grievance has been redressed. Court allowed the prayer and disposed of the application.
Prayer to withdraw the writ petition allowed; application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7214 of 2017
======================================================
Moti Tatma son of Late Mangal Tatma resident of village - Om Nagar, Ward No. - 08, P.S. - Araria, District - Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Harish Kumar-Gp8 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 01-05-2019
Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. He submits that the grievance of the petitioner prayed for in the instant writ petition has already been redressed and as such he seeks permission to withdraw this application
Prayer is allowed.
Application is disposed off as withdrawn.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Prakash/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
Moti Tatma son of Late Mangal Tatma
The State Of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Araria
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Araria, Chief Executive Officer, D.R.D.A. Araria
The Director District Rural Development, Araria
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
