Allowed

Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC19 Jul 2019CWJC/5786/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenged the failure of the concerned authorities to implement an order passed in Encroachment Case No. 05 of 2016/17 regarding the removal of an encroachment. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the authorities to execute the existing order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the concerned authorities in the district of Saran to implement the order passed in Encroachment Case No. 05 of 2016/17 within three months.

Chandan Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5786 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chandan Kumar Yadav Son of Mohan Ray, Resident of Village-Dhanauti, P.S. Panapur, District Saran at Chapra.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary Department of Home, Government of BIhar, Patna.

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenew and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Collector-Cuim-District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra.

¶11

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Marhourah, Saran.

¶12

Th Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Marhaurah, Saran.

¶13

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Marhaurah, Saran.

¶14

The Circle Officer, Panapur, Saran.

¶15

The Block Development officer, Panapur, Saran.

¶16

The Circle Inspector, Panapur, Saran.

¶17

Sri Rajdeo Ram, the Block Agriculture Officer, Panapur, Saran Deployed as Magistrate.

¶18

The Station House-Officer, P.S. Panapur, Saran

¶19

The Sri Kedar rai, Son of Heera rai,

¶20

Sri Hari Rai, Son of Heera Rai

¶21

Sri Binod Rai, Son of Heera rai.

¶22

Sri Batam Rai Son of late Banaras Rai. Respondents no. 14 to 17 are Resident of Village-Dhanauti, P.S. Panapur, District Saran at Chapra.

¶23

... ... Respondent/s

¶24

======================================================

¶25

Appearance :

¶26

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jeetendra Narayan For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam -Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶27

Date : 19-07-2019

¶28

Heard Mr. Jitendra Narayan, learned counsel

¶29

appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan,

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.5786 of 2018 dt.19-07-2019 2/3

¶31

learned AC to AAG-12 for the State.

¶32

Mr. Md. Majid Mahboob Khan, learned AC to AAG12 in reference to the counter affidavit submits that bearing note of the encroachment/complaint that Encroachment Case No. 05 of 2016-17 has been initiated and orders were passed for removal of encroachment and action taken but facing adverse situation that the authorities had to return back. Such is the statement made in para-7 of the counter affidavit.

¶33

It is further mentioned that request was made to the Sub-divisional Officer, Marhourah, Saran for providing assistance for implementation of order and police force for removal of encroachment.

¶34

Learned counsel for the State fairly informs that counter affidavit was filed on 04.05.2019 and the development thereafter is not known to him.

¶35

Having considered the submission advanced on behalf of the State as well as the stand taken in the counter affidavit and since the issue of encroachment in writ petition is not contested, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the concerned authorities in the district of Saran including the respondent nos. 4 to 11 to take all possible steps for implementation of order passed in Encroachment Case No. 05

¶36

Patna High Court CWJC No.5786 of 2018 dt.19-07-2019 3/3

¶37

of 2016/17, if already not executed, within a period of three months from today.

¶38

With the observations above, we dispose of the writ

¶39

petition.

¶40

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶41

( Partha Sarthy, J)

¶42

sushma/-
AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	25.7.19
Transmission Date	NA

Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunila Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kalika Cooling System Vs The State of Bihar

Ruplal Ray @ Ruplal Prashad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Sharan Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bambam Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Mogees Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.