Allowed

Amod Kumar Ojha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Apr 2019CWJC/5452/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for a mandamus directing provisional unsealing of a shop sealed in excise proceedings. The court allowed the petition, directing provisional unsealing upon deposit of original title deed and one surety as security, with an undertaking not to transfer property pending final confiscation.

What did the court decide?

Provisional unsealing of the shop and handing over possession upon deposit of original title deed with one surety as security and submission of an undertaking.

Amod Kumar Ojha Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5452 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Amod Kumar Ojha, S/o Sri Ramayan Ojha aged about 34 years, Male, R/o Village-Amahi Banke, P.S.-Kateya, District-Gopalganj

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gopalganj

¶8

The Excise Commissioner Bihar, Patna

¶9

The Superintendent of Excise, Gopalganj

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyendra Rai For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish (SC5)

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶16

Date : 12-04-2019

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶18

This application has been filed for a Mandamus directing the State-respondents to release/unseal the shop of the petitioner sealed in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 359 of 2018 registered under section 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the shop in question is a joint family property of the petitioner.

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.5452 of 2019 dt.12-04-2019 2/3

¶21

He has no concern at all with the alleged occurrence. He further submits that petitioner is ready to furnish adequate security for unsealing of his property in question. He also submits that for the alleged recovery of 1.440 liters of IMFL, the confiscation proceeding for the property in question is yet to be initiated.

¶22

Learned counsel for the State is present and submits that in the given facts and circumstances of this case if at all the Court is willing to consider provisional unsealing of the hotel then the interest of the State is required to be protected.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstance of the case where it is said to be a shop under the seizure of more than four months and the petitioner is ready to furnish adequate security to safeguard the interest of the State, following the consistent views of the Division Bench of this Court, we direct the designated Court below that pending finalization of confiscation proceeding, the shop of the petitioner be provisionally unsealed and possession be handed over to him on the petitioner's depositing the original title deed of the property in question as security with one surety to the extent of value of the property as per the circle rate with the designated Court below.

¶24

The owner of the property shall give an

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.5452 of 2019 dt.12-04-2019 3/3

¶26

undertaking that during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding, he will not deal with the property in question and shall not create any third party interest whatsoever.

¶27

On submission of the original title deed of the property in question together with the surety and the undertaking as mentioned above, the shop in question shall be unsealed and possession be handed over within a fortnight thereafter. The title deed deposited by the petitioner shall be kept in safe custody of the designated Court below and shall be subject to outcome in the confiscation proceeding.

¶28

The writ petition is allowed to the extent as stated

¶29

hereinabove.

¶30

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶31

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶32

Shailendra/-

¶33

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	24.04.2019
Transmission Date	NA

Amod Kumar Ojha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amod Kumar Ojha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Happy Science Bodhgaya India Vs The Commissioner of Income Taxes, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Jhorik Prasad Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Prem Shankar kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Bandana Devi Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Prabeen Kumar @ Munna Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.