The Patna High Court disposed of a writ application on the petitioner's withdrawal subject to liberty to file an appeal within 30 days under Rule 32 of the Bihar Targeted PDS (Control) Order, 2016.
Petitioner granted liberty to prefer an appeal under Rule 32 of the Control Order, 2016 within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.520 of 2019
======================================================
Dularchand Sah Son of Late Anirudh Sah, Resident of Village- Etimaha Itamba Ganesh, Police Station- Tarari, District- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh. For the Respondent/s : Mr.S.Raza Ahmad -AAG5 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 14-08-2019 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to prefer an appeal under Rule 32 of the Bihar Targeted PDS (Control) Order, 2016 within a period of 30 days from today.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the
same.
In the given facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application is being disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy under Rule 32 of the Control Order, 2016 by filing an appeal within 30 days from today. In case such an appeal is preferred within the prescribed period,
Patna High Court CWJC No.520 of 2019(2) dt.14-08-2019 2/2
the same will be considered by the Collector on its own merit and in case a question of limitation arises for consideration the same will be considered keeping in mind that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
arvind/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to dispose the writ application on withdrawal by the petitioner with liberty to avail statutory appeal remedy
Whether to fix a period for filing the appeal under Rule 32 of the Control Order, 2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dularchand Sah
State Of Bihar
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
