Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ application, which was granted. Consequently, the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4726 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate Mr. Prateek Tandon, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anisul Haque, A.C. to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
3 04-09-2019 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Application.
Permission is granted.
The Writ Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Rajeev/- U
Laxman Singh
Vidya Nand Singh
Bijli Singh
Binod Singh
Dharmendra Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
