Disposed

Ram Kewal Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Aug 2019CWJC/4284/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought direction to pay arrears of salary for the period spent in judicial custody. The Court held that there is no automatic entitlement and directed the respondents to decide the matter under Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code within 60 days.

What did the court decide?

The respondents were directed to take appropriate decision under Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code within 60 days.

Ram Kewal Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4284 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ram Kewal Sharma Son of Late Deo Shital Sharma, Resident of VillageLaxman Pur bath, P.S.-Parasi, District-Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar

¶6

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Arwal.

¶8

The District Education Officer, Arwal.

¶9

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Arwal.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindeshwar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar AC to GP 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 22-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶15

State.

¶16

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for a direction to the respondents to pay arrears of salary for the period he was in judicial custody i.e. from 18.12.1997 to 21.09.1998.

¶17

From Annexure-2 it appears that the petitioner on conviction was inflicted death sentence. However, his appeal was allowed by the High Court on 9.10.2013.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to payment of salary for the period he was in judicial custody. He placed reliance on the order dated 6.12.2012 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench in CWJC No. 829 of 2010. The Co-ordinate Bench relying upon Rule 96 of the Bihar

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.4284 of 2017(3) dt.22-08-2019 2/2

¶20

Service Code held out that the petitioner is entitled to payment of full salary. However, the relevant rule 97 of Bihar Service Code warrants appropriate decision on the point of treatment of period of suspension.

¶21

In view of the above, the Court is of the considered view that for the period the petitioner was in judicial custody, the respondents are required to pass appropriate order in terms of Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code. There cannot be automatic entitlement of payment of salary if the incumbent is released from jail. Since there is no decision in terms of Section 97, the Court directs the respondents to take appropriate decision in terms of Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code as to whether the petitioner is entitled for salary or not.

¶22

The writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to take appropriate decision in terms of Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶23

The payment of salary would abide by the final decision in this regard by the respondents.

¶24

spandey/- U

¶25

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

Ram Kewal Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kewal Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rabindra Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of B

Lalita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Mr. R. K. Mahajan The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Developme

Md. Kalamuddin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Umapati Upadhyay Vs The Chancellor Of Universities and Ors.

Tarannum Afreen Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Kusum and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.