Allowed

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Raja v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC2 Apr 2019CWJC/3817/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court orally set aside a stay order on the petitioner's building contractor registration imposed for one year without a valid show-cause notice. The matter was remanded to the officer-in-charge to give proper hearing opportunity and reconsider without prejudice to the petitioner against a Departmental Minister's recommendation.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 28.01.2019 set aside; matter remitted to Respondent no. 3 for fresh consideration after giving a show-cause opportunity.

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Raja Vs The State of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3817 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Raja, Resident of Parsahi Sirsiya P.O. Parsahi Sirsiya and P.S. Khutauna Dist.-Madhubani

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Building Construction,Govt. of Bihar,Patna

¶7

The Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna

¶8

The Engineer in Chief cum Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary Department of Building Construction, Govt. of Bihar,Patna

¶9

The Chief Engineer (North) Department of Building Construction,Vishveshwariya Bhawan,Bailey Road Patna

¶10

The Superintending Engineer, Department of Building Construction,Darbhanga

¶11

The Executive Engineer, Department of Building Construction,Building Division Madhubani

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav (AAG11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 02-04-2019

¶15

This is yet another case which has come to the notice

¶16

of this Court in which it is apparent from the materials available on the record that the respondent authorities in the Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar has acted in hot haste and passed the impugned order as contained in memo no.1018(bha) dated 28.01.2019 by which the registration of the petitioner has been placed under suspension for a period of one year. A similar case had come to this Court in CWJC No.2391 of 2019 which was allowed vide order dated 05.03.2019.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.3817 of 2019(4) dt.02-04-2019 2/3

¶18

Mr. Kejriwal, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits the facts of this case are identical to the case in CWJC No.2391 of 2019. It is submitted that on a bare perusal of Annexure-2 to the writ application it would appear that by no stretch of imagination it may be said to be a show cause notice indicating that any action for suspension of the registration of the petitioner may be taken by the respondent authorities. Learned counsel submits that the show cause notice was only with respect to one work that too at the instance of the Departmental Minister which the petitioner had duly responded vide Annexure-3 to the writ application, but then without looking into Annexure-3 the Engineer in Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Building Construction Department has passed the impugned order by which the registration of the petitioner has been placed under suspension.

¶19

Learned counsel representing the State has, after some argument, accepted the position as appearing from the records particularly Annexure-2 and submits that so far as Annexure-2 is concerned, at least this document nowhere gives any impression that it is a show cause notice for any proposed action under the Bihar Contractors Registration Rules, 2007.

¶20

In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.3817 of 2019(4) dt.02-04-2019 3/3

¶22

impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted to the respondent no.3 for fresh consideration of the entire materials available on the record. The respondent no.3 shall proceed to consider the whole matter after giving an appropriate opportunity to show cause to the petitioner against the proposed action, if any, and shall consider the reply of the petitioner without being prejudiced by any recommendation of the Departmental Minister.

¶23

The writ application stands disposed off accordingly.

¶24

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶25

arvind/-

¶26

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Raja v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Raja v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Buni Lal Sah and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Mohammad Naushad Vs South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. and Ors.

Shobhit Lal Mahto @ Shobit Mahto and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Deenbandhu Jha Vs The Chief Manager and Ors.

Nkg Infrastructure Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Raijee Mini Rice Mill, Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.