Petitioners seeking benefits similar to those granted in a previous analogous writ petition were directed to file a representation requesting verification of their eligibility and issuance of a reasoned order.
Direction to file representation for verification of eligibility to avail benefits accorded in analogous cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3004 of 2018
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar -SC-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, learned advocate for the
petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is exactly similar to the cases of Lachhaman Kumar and
others as well as other petitioners whose cases were
Patna High Court CWJC No.3004 of 2018(3) dt.08-05-2019 2/3
heard analogous with C.W.J.C. No. 9633 of 2016 in which a composite order was passed on 27.02.2019.
The petitioners, therefore are also entitled to the benefits which have been accorded to the writ petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 9633 of 2016 and other cases which were decided analogous with that case.
The petitioners, therefore are directed to file a representation before the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna, annexing a copy of this order as well as the order dated 27.02.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9633 of 2016 and other analogous cases, within a period of two weeks from today. On receipt of such representation, the concerned respondent shall verify the facts and if it is found that the case of the petitioners is similar to the case of such employees about which reference has been made earlier, the petitioners also shall be accorded the same benefit by a reasoned order within a further period of six weeks thereafter.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3004 of 2018(3) dt.08-05-2019 3/3
With the aforesaid observation/direction, the
writ petition stands disposed off.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Shageer/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners, similar to other employees, are entitled to benefits accorded in a previous analogous writ.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lachhaman Kumar and othersAffirmed¶20
C.W.J.C. No. 9633 of 2016
Vishwanath Prasad
Dinesh Sharma
Birendra Kumar Pratap Narayan Singh
State of Bihar
Finance Secretary
Secretary Expenditure
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
