Disposed

Dr. Sudarshan Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Dec 2019CWJC/25575/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner alleged discrimination regarding the grant of the 3rd Major Administrative Control Promotion (MACP). The court disposed of the petition despite the petitioner's retirement, directing authorities to examine the claim and grant the benefit retroactively from the date juniors received it.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to examine petitioner's claim and grant 3rd MACP benefit from the date juniors were granted it within sixty days.

Dr. Sudarshan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25575 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dr. Sudarshan Prasad Son of Late Mishri Ram, Resident of Postal Colony, Fazalganj, P.S.-Sasaram, District-Sasaram.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Resources Dept, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Joint Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhu Nath Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (GP-18) ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

¶13

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is discrimination in the matter of grant of 3^rd MACP.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that juniors to the petitioner have been granted such benefit but the petitioner has been discriminated. He further submitted that petitioner has retired on 28.02.2011.

¶15

Considering the fact that the petitioner has now superannuated, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner and if it is found that any junior to him has been granted benefit of 3^rd MACP, the respondents shall adopt corrective measure and

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.25575 of 2019(2) dt.20-12-2019 2/2

¶17

grant benefit of the same from the date juniors to the petitioner have been granted such benefit. Necessary decision in this regard may be taken within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶18

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed

¶19

of.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶21

spandey/-

¶22

Dr. Sudarshan Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Sudarshan Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bimal Chandra Rakshit, Vs The State Of Bihar

Indrajeet Kumar Vs the Union of India

Ashok Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Lalita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Bhushan Prasad Verma @ Ramdeo, Vs The State of Bihar

Parmeshwar Dushadh Vs The State of Bihar