Disposed

Vishnu Ram v. State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC14 Oct 2019CWJC/22705/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna disposed of a writ petition regarding the petitioner's pension and gratuity. Relying on respondent accounts showing sanction of amounts, the court directed authorities to pay within four weeks if unpaid, threatening salary withholding of the Treasury Officer otherwise.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; direction to pay pension, gratuity, and leave encashment within four weeks if not already paid.

Vishnu Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22705 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Vishnu Ram S/oLate Ram Baria Ram R/o Damuchak Shivpuri,P.O. Damuchak,P.S. Kazi Mohammedpur,Distt.-Muzaffarpur

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Bihar

¶7

The Secretary,Road Construction Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna

¶8

The Joint Secetary,Road Construction Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna

¶9

The Deputy Secretary Vigilance,Road Construction Department,Govt. of Bihar,Bihar at Patna

¶10

The Chief Engineer Ganga Bridge Project,Road Construction Department

¶11

The Accountant General Bihar, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Respondent/s : Mr.Syed Iqbal Ahmad, SC-20 For the A.G. : Mr. Arun Kumar Arun ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶15

6 14-10-2019 The learned counsel for the Accountant General has filed a counter affidavit wherein it has been stated that the full amount of pension and full amount of gratuity has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner vide letter dated 30.07.2019 and thereafter authorization has also been issued vide order dated 11.09.2019. As far as the leave encashment amount is concerned, the authority for payment of the same has been issued in favour of the petitioner by an order which is annexed as Annexure-R6/6 to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 6.

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.22705 of 2018(6) dt.14-10-2019 2/2

¶17

In such view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the aforesaid amount has not been actually paid then the same be directed to be paid within a period of four weeks from today.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition stands disposed off in light of the statement made by the respondent no. 6 in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 6 i.e. the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, however, with a direction to the respondent authorities to make actual payment of the aforesaid amount, in case the same has not been paid, within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the Treasury Officer concerned shall not draw his salary.

¶19

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶20

S.Sb/-

¶21

Vishnu Ram v. State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu Ram v. State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramjee Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Rajak, Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Mishra, Retired Principal, High School, Deendayalpur, Siwan, Vs The State Of Bihar

Ganesh Prasad Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.