The High Court of Patna allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ application, which the State accepted, and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Writ application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2211 of 2018
======================================================
Pinki Kumari wife of Tutu Baitha, Village + P.O. Panchayat - Kuama, Ward No. - 8, Prakhand - Piprahi, District - Sheohar.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Smt.Archana Meenakshee -GP6
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the State has not objection to it. Let this writ application be dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
avin/-ved-
U
Pinki Kumari wife of Tutu Baitha
The Principal Secretary, Panchyati Raj Department, State of Bihar
The District Officer-cum-Collector, Sheohar
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
