Allowed

Shri Kishsun Kushwaha @ Kishun @ Shri Krishna Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC6 Feb 2019CWJC/2184/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court writ petition allowed the provisional release of a seized motorcycle bearing registration No. BR-22J-8451. The court directed the petitioner to produce ownership papers, registration, and provide two sureties before the court below. The release is conditioned upon furnishing specific affidavits and is subject to the initiation and finalization of confiscation proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of the seized motorcycle directed on production of ownership, registration, and two sureties with conditional undertakings.

Shri Kishsun Kushwaha @ Kishun @ Shri Krishna… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2184 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shri Kishsun Kushwaha @ Kishun @ Shri Krishna Kushwaha, S/o Channu Mahto, R/o village - Murgahava Police Station – Dhanaha, District - West Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar

¶8

The District Magistrate West Champaran at Bettiah

¶9

The Superintendent of police, Bagaha, (West Champaran)

¶10

The District Transport Officer, West champaran at Bettiah

¶11

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah

¶12

The S.H.O., Dhaneha, Bagola.

¶13

... ... Respondents

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Sharan Tiwari, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP 7

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶19

Date : 06-02-2019

¶20

Perused the office note.

¶21

The defect is ignored.

¶22

With the consent of the parties the matter is taken up “For

¶23

Admission”.

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶25

The petitioner prays for provisional release of the black-red Discover motorcycle bearing registration No. BR-22J-8451, Engine No. JDZREE35693, Chasis No. MD2A14AZ1ERF51480, which has been seized in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 197 of 2018 for the

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.2184 of 2019 dt.06-02-2019 2/3

¶27

offences punishable under sections 30(A) & 37(B) of the Bihar Excise Prohibition Act, 2016.

¶28

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that 540 ml of Foreign liquor has been seized; the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list supports the seizure of the motorcycle and 540 ml of Foreign liquor.

¶29

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the court below with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/ undertakings:

¶30

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in further.

¶31

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶32

Patna High Court CWJC No.2184 of 2019 dt.06-02-2019 3/3

¶33

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

¶34

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared by the court below wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

¶35

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding, if any.

¶36

With the observations above, this writ petition is allowed.

¶37

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶38

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶39

Archana/

¶40

Surendra/-

¶41

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	16.02.2019
Transmission Date	NA

Shri Kishsun Kushwaha @ Kishun @ Shri Krishna Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Kishsun Kushwaha @ Kishun @ Shri Krishna Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brahmdeo Prasad Mahton Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Usha Lata Welfare Society Barari Guru Bazar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Kanhaiya Lal Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Rizwan Vs Aarasi

Md. Naushad Alam Naushad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar Vs Komal Kumari and Ors.