Order correcting the name of Respondent No. 6 in a writ petition and permitting correction in the main writ application. Disposition of the matter itself pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2183 of 2019
======================================================
Uday Shankar Jha S/o Dev Narayan Jha, Resident of Village and PanchayatKaithahi, P.S. Raj Nagar, District-Madhubani
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 19-06-2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the correct name of Respondent No. 6 is Vinay Kumar S/o late Uttim Lal Mandal, Resident of Village Parsa, P.S. Raj Nagar, District – Madhubani.
Petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of parties in the main writ application in course of the day.
Let a fresh order be issued after correction of name of Respondent No. 6.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
avin/-ved U
Uday Shankar Jha
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Food Supply and consumer protection Department
The District Magistrate, Madhubani
The District Supply Officer, Madhubani
The Sub Divisional Officer Sadar Madhubani
The Block Supply Officer, Raj Nagar, Madhubani
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
