Vidyalaya,Mohiudddin Nagar, within the district of Samastipur (hereinafter referred to as the “KGBV”) by an order dated 07.11.2007contained in memo No. 1418. Pursuant thereto, she continued towork at the said Vidyalaya where her assignment was converted as a full-time Urdu teacher to teach Urdu where 10-20 students belonging to the minority community were reading. She discharged her services as a full-time teacher, but, again by an order dated 28.01.2014, the status of the appellant was converted to parttime teacher. 3. Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that in pursuance to her appointment, the appellant was continuously discharging her duty and her contract was extended from time to time. It was submitted that several writ applications came to be filed, as vide Memo No. 835 dated 16.02.2016, the Director, State Project Council, Bihar, Patna, communicated that all teachers in“KGBV”, who were full-time teachers would now be referred to as part-time teachers. The parttime teachers, legally and validly appointed, would now be known as Vocational Training Instructors. Prior to their extension of the contract, a consent of part-time teacher was to be taken, accepting the nomenclature of Vocational Training Instructor. It was also stated in the aforementioned letter that the post of Vocational Training Instructors would be a dying cadre and with the completion of the contract, the post would be abolished. Learned counsel further submitted that the aforementioned memo converting the post of part-time teacher as Vocational Training Instructors amounts to not only abolishing the post after completion of contract, but also treating her as a vocationalist though she has
