petitioner and not either her parents or her relatives got her illegally admitted in the second school with ulterior motive of fetching good marks in the Intermediate examination by allowing somebody else to appear at the examination on behalf of the petitioner. This act might have been committed by the parents of the petitioner but by such misdeeds of the parents of the petitioner, the cancellation of candidature of the petitioner and withholding the result of the petitioner in my view is not justified and legal. The petitioner has already lost two academic years firstly on account of cancellation of her candidature to appear at the Intermediate Annual Examination, 2017 and later on although the petitioner was allowed to appear at the compartmental examination but her result was withheld subject to the result of the enquiry report. Section 18 of School Examination Laws says about the mal-practice, indiscipline, etc. that in case it was found that the examination has been violated by error, improper conduct, or other causes or where mal-practice, fraud, or act of indiscipline or use of unfair means are reported to have been practised, the Board shall have the power to cancel the examination or to withhold or amend the result in such cases and to take such other action as it may deem fit. This provision itself shows that such mal-practice and unfair means or act of indiscipline should have been committed by the examinees during the course of examination. If the parents of an examinee, who was admittedly minor on the date of registration or admission, got such a candidate admitted in second school or got second registration number with ulterior motive, on account of such illegal acts of parents, such examinee should not be allowed to suffer, therefore, I find that the order dated 24.04.2018 as contained in Annexure-7 is illegal and not sustainable. Accordingly, the order dated 24.04.2018 as contained in Annexure-7 is
