The petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 seeking quashing of an order dismissing his appeal due to limitation. The Court found no reason to entertain the application and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21004 of 2019
======================================================
Sakaldeo Ravidas, Son of Tetar Ravidas Resident of Teliyadih, P.S. Jhajha, District-Jamui, Ex.P.R.S. Karma Panchayat, P.S. Jhajha, Block Jhajah District-Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anand Kishore Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. Khursid Alam ( Aag12 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has filed this application, under article 226 of the constitution of India, for quashing the order dated 07.06.2019 passed in Service Appeal Case No. 01 of 2019 by the District Magistrate, Jamui, dismissing the aforesaid appeal of the petitioner due to filing the same after limitation period.
I find no reason to entertain the present writ application and accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
Bhardwaj/-
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ application seeking quashing of an order dismissing an appeal filed after the limitation period.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sakaldeo Ravidas
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Jamui
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Jamui
RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
