Allowed

Nilophar Bano v. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University and Ors.

Patna HC23 Aug 2019CWJC/20913/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses the appeal and stays the proceedings below. It affirms that the Subordinate Court has the authority to set up a driving school, stating that no specific provision in the Motor Vehicles Act prohibits such an activity, and thus the Subordinate Court acted within its jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

Writ application allowed; University directed to publish LL.B. results within 45 days.

Nilophar Bano Vs The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur… — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20913 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Nilophar Bano, wife of Md. Imran, Resident of 27, Hussain Bakhash Lane, Jagdispur, P.S. Kotwali, Distt. Bhagalpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University through its Registrar

¶7

The Vice- Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur university, Bhagalpur

¶8

The Registrar, Tika Manjhi Bhaglpur University, Bhagalpur

¶9

The Examination Controller, Tilka Mnjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

¶10

The Principal, T.N.B. Law College, Bhagalpur

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶13

5 23-08-2019

¶14

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is non-publication of the final result of LL.B. examination of the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after scrutiny, the University allowed the petitioner to appear in PartI, II and III LL.B examination and the petitioner appeared in the examination and cleared the same. He submits that now the University is taking plea of contrary to the examination regulation.

¶16

The issue raised in the present writ application is squarely covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Shri Krishna vs The Kurukshetra University, reported in

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.20913 of 2018(5) dt.23-08-2019 2/2

¶18

AIR 1976 SC 376 where the Apex Court has occasion to discuss that where with open eye allowed by the University, they are estopped from taking the plea of breach of regulation. In the instant case also, the scrutiny was done with open eye by TMB University and as such it does not lie in the mouth of the University to find fault with the petitioner, as the petitioner application was duly scrutinized by the University and thereafter the petitioner was allowed to appear at the examination and the petitioner cleared the examination of Part-I, II and III of LL.B.

¶19

Considering the judgment of the Apex Court mentioned herein above, the writ application is allowed. The University is directed to publish the result of LL.B. of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶20

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands

¶21

allowed.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶23

uday/-

¶24

Nilophar Bano v. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilophar Bano v. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Nath Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Priyadarshi Ajay Vs The State of Bihar

Pushpanjali Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dharikshan Singh Teachers Training College Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anupama Kumari Vs The Medical Council Of India Through Its Secretary and Ors.

Dr. Rajendra Jha Vs The State of Bihar