Disposed

Satendra Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Oct 2019CWJC/20701/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a Head Master, challenged a decision preventing him from working as a Drawing and Disbursing Officer. The court denied interference with the interim arrangement but disposed of the petition by directing the respondents to decide on his pending representation within sixty days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.8.2019 within sixty days.

Satendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20701 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Satendra Kumar Singh S/O- Chandrika Singh, Resident of village- Bairiya, P.O.- Bairiya, P.S.- Piprahi, District- Sheohar at present posted as Head Master, Middle School Purnahiya, Block - Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Additional Secretary - cum - Department Office Admin, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The District Education Officer, District- Sheohar.

¶11

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, District- Sheohar.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nalin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kameshwar Kumar (GP-17) ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 16-10-2019 The petitioner is holding the substantive post of Headmaster and on account of seniority he was authorized to work as Drawing and Disbursing Officer. Now the respondents have decided not to allow this petitioner any further to work as Drawing and Disbursing Officer.

¶17

There is no substantive post of Drawing and Disbursing Officer. It is only an interim arrangement. The substantive post of the petitioner is Headmaster and he is still holding the post of Headmaster.

¶18

Therefore, the Court is not inclined to interfere with

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.20701 of 2019(2) dt.16-10-2019 2/2

¶20

the interim arrangement made by the respondents in the nature of authorizing xyz as Drawing and Disbursing Officer.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already represented the District Education Officer in relation to his grievance as to Drawing and Disbursing Officer. He submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the District Education Officer, Sheohar to dispose of the representation dated 24.8.2019.

¶22

Without entering into the merit of the claim of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 24.8.2019 at the earliest preferably within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶23

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed

¶24

of.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶26

spandey/-

¶27

Satendra Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satendra Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shayamadeo Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suresh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Benkatesh Kumar @ Bankatesh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.