Sudha Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the application as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that their grievances had already been redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20129 of 2016
======================================================
| Sudha Sharma The State Of Bihar & Ors. ==================== |
... Petitioner Versus ... Respondents ================================== |
|---|---|
| Appearance : | |
| For the Petitioner : |
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Adv. |
| For the Respondents : ==================== |
Mr.Gajendra Pd. Yadav, SC XVII ================================== |
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
Under such circumstances, this application is
dismissed as infructuous .
(Nilu Agrawal, J)
Shamshad/-
U
Sudha Sharma
The State Of Bihar & Ors.
Nilu Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court