High Court granted liberty to file an appeal against a confiscation order and provisionally released a seized motorcycle on security and undertakings pending the appeal.
Provisional release of the vehicle on security and undertaking; liberty to file appeal within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19936 of 2018
======================================================
Jaynath Ray, son of Maheshi Ray, resident of Ward No. 6, Lal Bandi Purve Pipra Parsain, Police Station- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar, SC 11
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)
Date : 22-04-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
This application has been filed seeking provisional release of the Hero Splendor Pro Motorcycle bearing registration No. BR 30L 3265, Chasis No. MBLHA10BFFHB34200, Engine No. HA10ERFHB60420 seized in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 166/2016 under Section 47(A) of Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016 and Sections 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Apart from a prayer for release of the vehicle the petitioner has also prayed for quashing of the order dated
Patna High Court CWJC No.19936 of 2018 dt.22-04-2019 2/5
22.06.2018 passed by the learned Collector, Sitamarhi in Confiscation Case No. 17/2017 by which a direction to confiscate the vehicle has been passed by the District Magistrate being the Confiscating Authority.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that for the present he would not be pressing the relief for quashing of the order dated 22.06.2018 passed by the learned Collector, Sitamarhi in Confiscation Case No. 17/2017, he, however, submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the confiscation order in an appropriate jurisdiction by filing an appeal before the Commissioner within a period of 30 days from today.
In the circumstances noted where final orders have been passed in the confiscation proceedings, we grant liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order of confiscation before the appellate authority within a period of 30 days from today. In case such an appeal is preferred within the aforesaid period together with an application for condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall consider the same keeping in mind that the petitioner was prosecuting his remedy before this Court and the appeal shall be heard on its own merit and disposed of expeditiously.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19936 of 2018 dt.22-04-2019 3/5
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that because the appellate authority has no power to pass an interim order of release, he would press this application for a provisional release of the vehicle in question.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that 1.5 liters of Country made liquor has been seized; the vehicle is lying under open sky in the Police Station for more than two years and if the release is not allowed, it would turn into a junk. He submits that the State is not going to gain by the vehicle turning junk. Learned Counsel further submits that the petitioner is willing to provide such surety and undertakings which may be required to protect the interest of the petitioner as well the State, during the pendency of the appeal.
Learned Counsel for the State is present and submits that in the given facts and circumstances of this case if at all the Court is willing to consider provisional release of the vehicle then interest of the State is required to be protected.
Bearing note of the order of release passed in similar circumstance in C.W.J.C. No. 8513 of 2018 whereby a provisional release has been allowed during the pendency of appeal subject to conditions imposed to protect the interest of the State, we take a similar view in the present case as well.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19936 of 2018 dt.22-04-2019 4/5
Let the vehicle in question be accordingly released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on the production of the document of ownership and registration in his name before the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi (Confiscating Authority) with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document.
The petitioner while submitting the surety bond shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:-
(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the appeal and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.
(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.
(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle a Panchnama would be got prepared by the confiscating authority wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future
Patna High Court CWJC No.19936 of 2018 dt.22-04-2019 5/5
if so required it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall undertake not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.
If the petitioner fails to present an appeal within 30 days as given above, the order of provisional release shall stand withdrawn and the Confiscating Authority shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.
The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties along with the undertakings as stated above. This release would, however, be subject to the order passed in appeal.
The writ petition is allowed with the
directions/observations above.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Archana/
Surendra/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 29.04.2019 |
| Transmission Date | NA |
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the seized vehicle should be provisionally released during the pendency of the appeal against confiscation.
Whether liberty should be granted to challenge the confiscation order in appellate jurisdiction.
What conditions must be satisfied for provisional release of the vehicle.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
C.W.J.C. No. 8513 of 2018Referred¶27
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jaynath Ray
State of Bihar
Jyoti Saran
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
