Disposed

Binod Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC10 Jun 2019CWJC/19379/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner approached the Patna High Court with a writ application. Upon learning of a conciliatory Memo issued by the respondents, the petitioner sought to withdraw the application with liberty to challenge the subsequent order. The Court permitted the withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ application with liberty to challenge the order in Annexure 'C' to the counter affidavit.

Binod Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19379 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Binod Kumar Chaudhary S/o Shri Vimal Chandra Chaudhary R/o VillageManihari (Dharmshala-Road) P.S.Manihari, District-Katihar and Presently Working as Treasury Guard in the Office of Executive Engineer at Work SubDivision Kesaria and Rural Works Department, Work Division Chakia, East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Engineer in Chief, Cum-Additional Secretary Cum Commissioner, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Engineer in Chief, cum-Additional Commissioner Cum Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Chief Engineer-3, Rural Works Department, Patna.

¶12

The Chief Engineer, Ganga Pul Pariyojana Upbhag, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶13

The Superintending Engineer, Ganga Pul, Anchal No.2, Road Construction Department, Bhagalpur.

¶14

The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Anchal, Motihari, East-Champaran.

¶15

The Technical Advisor, Ganga Pul, Anchal No.2, Road Construction Department, Bhagalpur.

¶16

The Executive Engineer, National Highway Road Division, Madhepura

¶17

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Chakia, East-Champaran.

¶18

The Executive Engineer, Vigilance Division-3 (Hqrs) Rural Works Department, Patna.

¶19

The Chief Engineer-4 H.Q. Rural Work Department, Patna.

¶20

... ... Respondent/s

¶21

======================================================

¶22

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhubneshwar Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶23

2 10-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one

¶24

appears for the State.

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.19379 of 2018(2) dt.10-06-2019 2/2

¶26

After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner finding that the State respondents have come out with Memo No. 1387 dated 04.12.2017 as contained in Annexure ‘C’ to their counter affidavit available on the record, submits that he may be granted permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to challenge the order as contained in Annexure ‘C’ to the counter affidavit.

¶27

As prayed, let this writ application be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶28

This writ application stands disposed off accordingly.

¶29

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶30

avin/-

¶31

Binod Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binod Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Simpi Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Prashant Bagla Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Saroj Kumari Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Niraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar