Allowed

Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC11 Mar 2019CWJC/18297/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition seeking provisional release of a seized motorcycle. The court directed release against security of two sureties and undertakings, subject to the finalization of pending confiscation proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of the motorcycle against two sureties and undertaking documents, subject to pending confiscation proceedings.

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Property and Title | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18297 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pramod Kumar, S/o Rajeshwer Sinha, R/o Vill- J.L.N.M., College, Bhagalpur, P.S. Bhagalpur, Distt. Bhagalpur, permament address- Raj Bhawan, Kali Bari, Rajgir, P.S.- Rajgir, Distt. Nalanda.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Excise, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Secretary, Department of Excise, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police Nalanda at Biharsharif.

¶10

The S.H.O. Rajgir, P.S. Rajgir, Nalanda.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish- SC5

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and

¶16

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶17

Date : 11-03-2019

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state.

¶19

The petitioner prays for provisional release of the Bajaj Pulsar 150 Motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR10N7022, Chasis No. MD2DHDHZZUCM09445, Engine No. DHGBUM75723, which has been seized in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶20

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.18297 of 2018 dt.11-03-2019 2/3

¶22

confiscation proceeding is pending and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list reflects the seizure of 500 ml. IMFL.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is pending, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nalanda at Biharsharif with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

¶24

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future:

¶25

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶26

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.18297 of 2018 dt.11-03-2019 3/3

¶28

when required.

¶29

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be got prepared by the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nalanda at Biharsharif, wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future, if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

¶30

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above. This release would, however, be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

¶31

With the observations/directions above, this writ petition is allowed.

¶32

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶33

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶34

Nasimul/Shailendra

¶35

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	16-03-2019
Transmission Date	N/A

Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Narayan Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Murtuza Ali Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nandlal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.