Allowed

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC11 Mar 2019CWJC/18274/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a writ petition seeking mandatory direction to unseal petitioner's residential property seized under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Directing provision of security and undertaking, the Court ordered the property be unsealed pending confiscation proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The housecum-room to be unsealed and possession handed over to the petitioner upon deposit of title deed as security and furnishing an undertaking not to deal with the property.

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18274 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanjay Kumar, aged about 35 years, Son of Shyam Yadav, Resident of Village-Jaganpura, P.S.-Ram Krishna Nagar, District-Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶7

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Patna.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Patna.

¶10

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Patna Sadar.

¶11

¶12

The Officer-in-Charge, Ram Krishna Nagar, Patna.

¶13

The Excise Inspector, Phulwari Sharif, Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish -SC5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶16

Date : 11-03-2019

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶18

This application has been filed for a Mandamus directing the State-respondents to release/unseal the Housecum-room of the petitioner sealed in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 351 of 2017 dated 17.11.2017 registered under Sections 30(a), (b), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.18274 of 2018 dt.11-03-2019 2/3

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the seizure list shows recovery of 21 liters of IMFL from the housecum-room of the petitioner. He is the bona fide owner of the house in question. Further submission is that that he has no information about the initiation of confiscation proceeding.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that in the given facts and circumstances of this case if at all the Court is willing to consider provisional unsealing of the house-cum-room then the interest of the State is required to be protected.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case where it is said to be a residential house under seizure for more than one year and the petitioner is ready to furnish adequate security to safeguard the interest of the State, following the consistent views of the Division Bench of this Court, we direct that pending initiation and disposal of the confiscation proceeding, the house-cum-room of the petitioner in question be unsealed and possession be handed over to the petitioner on the petitioner's depositing the original title deed of the property in question as security with one surety to the extent of the value of the property as per the circle rate before the designated Court below.

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.18274 of 2018 dt.11-03-2019 3/3

¶24

The owner of the property shall give an undertaking that he will not deal with the property in question and shall not create any third party interest whatsoever in the meanwhile.

¶25

On submission of the original title deed of the property in question together with the surety and the undertaking as mentioned above, the house-cum-room in question shall be de-sealed and possession be handed over within a fortnight thereafter. The title deed deposited by the petitioner shall be kept in safe custody of the designated Court below.

¶26

The application is allowed with the observations and directions set out hereinabove.

¶27

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶28

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶29

Shailendra/-

¶30

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	02.04.2019
Transmission Date	N/A

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Narayan Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Murtuza Ali Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nandlal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.