Allowed

Vijay Kuamr Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC11 Mar 2019CWJC/18176/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought provisional release of a motorcycle seized in an excise case pending before the Patna High Court. The court issued directions for release subject to sureties and undertakings, subject to the outcome of confiscation proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of the seized motorcycle directed upon production of ownership, registration, two sureties, and specific undertakings within 14 days.

Vijay Kuamr Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18176 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Vijay Kuamr Ram Son of Latre Ramdhani Ram R/o Village Bandipur, P.S. Ramgarh, District Kaimur at Bhabua

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Director General of Police, Bihar Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Kaimur at Bhabua.

¶9

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabua.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Manish -SC5

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶14

Date : 11-03-2019

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶16

The petitioner prays for provisional release of the Hero Passion Pro Motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR-45H9328, which has been seized in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 211 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 37(I)(II), 56(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶17

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is pending and the vehicle is lying

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.18176 of 2018 dt.11-03-2019 2/3

¶19

under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list reflects the seizure of 16 bottles of 8 PM whiskey each containing 180 ml., 13 bottles of country liquor each containing 200ml. and 3 bottles of 8 PM whiskey each containing 375 ml.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is pending, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Kaimur at Bhabua with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

¶21

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

¶22

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶23

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.18176 of 2018 dt.11-03-2019 3/3

¶25

produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

¶26

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Kaimur at Bhabua would got prepared a Panchanama wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

¶27

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above. This release would, however, be subject to the final order passed in the confiscation proceeding.

¶28

With the observations/directions above, this writ petition is allowed.

¶29

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶30

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶31

mcv/-

¶32

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	26.03.2019
Transmission Date	NA

Vijay Kuamr Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kuamr Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Narayan Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Murtuza Ali Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nandlal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.