In an oral order, the Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition which was voluntarily withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner on 06-09-2019.
The writ application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17845 of 2018
======================================================
Zeeshan Gazi Son of Gazi Salauddin, Resident of Village- Bistoriya, P.S.Raniganj, District- Araria.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Pushkar Narain Shahi -Aag6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 06-09-2019 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays
to withdraw this writ application. There is no objection to the same, let the writ application be dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
vats/ved
U
Zeeshan Gazi
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Collector, Araria
The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Araria
The Executive Officer, Panchayat Samittee, Raniganj cum Block Development Officer, Raniganj
Deputy Development Commissioner, Araria
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
