Disposed

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 May 2019CWJC/17677/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order held that the District Magistrate, Jehanabad, must decide on the petitioner's application for gun license extension within sixty days after the general election, considering the Superintendent of Police's recommendation regarding threat perception.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Magistrate to decide on the petitioner's application for extension of arms license within sixty days after the general election, considering the Superintendent of Police's report

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17677 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chandan Kumar Son of Sri Kaulesh Sharma, Resident of Village-P.O. Moker, P.S. Karauna O.P., District Jehanabad, Bihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶7

The District MagistrateCum Collector, Jehanabad.

¶8

The District Arms Magistrate, District Arms Section, Jehanabad.

¶9

Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Shankar For the Respondent/s : Mr.S.K. Sharma

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶17

Petitioner is holder of gun license but his gun license is confine to the district of Jehanabad.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is contractor and his construction work is going on in extremely infested area and as such he needs extension of his gun license. With reference to Annexure-8 he submits that Superintend of Police has already recommended the District Arms Magistrate referring to previous attack on the petitioner and threat perception against the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the recommendation of the

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.17677 of 2017(2) dt.15-05-2019 2/2

¶21

Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad dated 20.2.2011, the Court directs the District Magistrate, Jehanabad to take appropriate decision on the application filed by the petitioner for extension of his arms license if not already taken within a period of sixty days after general election.

¶22

While taking decision the District Magistrate is required to take into consideration the report of Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad.

¶23

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

Ravi/-

¶26

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Sri Badi Devi Ji Seva Samiti Dharamshala Trust and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shyam Nandan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Aman Raj

Abu Arshad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.