Dismissed

Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Nov 2019CWJC/1721/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an employee regarding retirement dues. The court found that the respondents had already paid the entire retirement dues, rendering the petition moot. The petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue grievances before departmental authorities.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed with liberty to pursue grievance before departmental authorities.

Vijay Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1721 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Vijay Ram S/o Late Patiram Ram, resident of Village P.O.- Turk Telpa, P.S.Bansi, District- Arwal, Bihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar

¶6

The Accountant General, Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

¶7

The Director Cum the Joint Commissioner, Directorate General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

¶8

The District Officer Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad.

¶9

The District Officer, Arwal, District- Arwal.

¶10

The District Development Commissioner, Arwal, District- Arwal.

¶11

The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad.

¶12

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Arwal.

¶13

The Treasury Officer, Arwal, District Arwal.

¶14

The Block Development Officer, Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad.

¶15

The Block Development Officer, Kaler, District- Arwal.

¶16

The Block Development Officer, Karpi, District- Arwal.

¶17

The Block Development Officer, Sone Bhadra- Bansi Suryapur, DistrictArwal.

¶18

The Block Development Officer, Kurtha, District- Arwal.

¶19

... ... Respondent/s

¶20

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kameshwar Prasad Gupta -Gp10 : Mr. Ashok Kr. Gupta For A.G. : Mr. Manish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶21

10 18-11-2019

¶22

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that nobody has been appearing for the petitioner from the last few dates, nonetheless, the fact of the matter is that the entire retiral dues has been paid, as would be apparent from the counter

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.1721 of 2018(10) dt.18-11-2019 2/2

¶24

affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit filed in the present case.

¶25

Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, since nothing survives for consideration, I deem it fit and proper to dispose off the present writ petition, however with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his subsisting grievance, if any, before the departmental authorities.

¶26

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶27

rinkee/-

¶28

Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Prakash Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar Barnwal @ Ajit Barnwal Vs the State of Bihar

Uma Shankar Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Binod Singh Vs The Union of India

Suresh Prasad Singh Vs The Union of India

Chandeshwar Singh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.