Dismissed

Nilam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC21 Feb 2019CWJC/1696/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed for payment of GPF dues and interest. Court held petitioner not entitled to GPF interest as termination was in 2001 and she did not apply for withdrawal within six months. Writ petition disposed without granting interest. Pending termination proceedings decided in 2015.

What did the court decide?

Claim for statutory interest on GPF amount dismissed; writ petition disposed of without granting further relief.

Nilam Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1696 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Nilam Kumari D/o Shri Brahmadeo Prasad, W/o Shailendra Kumar, R/o Village - Shairapar, P.O. - Bhadru, P.S. - Chandi, District - Nalanda.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Civil Surgeon - cum - Chief Medical Officer Nalanda at Biharsharif.

¶9

The District Provident Fund Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

¶10

... ... Respondents

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Binit Kumar, Advocate Mr. U B Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Anwar Karim, AC to GP 10 ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

5 21-02-2019

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶15

learned counsel for the State.

¶16

Writ petition has been filed for payment of dues on account of GPF, Group insurance and other statutory dues along with interest. During pendency of the writ petition, dues of the petitioner have been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner however submits that statutory interest on GPF has not been paid to the petitioner till the date of payment.

¶17

Specific stand has been taken in paragraph 12 of the counter affidavit by respondent no.4 that the interest on the amount deposited by the subscriber is calculated on the basis of GPF Rule 14(4) and the Circular No.3373 dated 6.5.1988 of the Finance Department, Government of Bihar. Statutory interest is paid to the subscriber till six months from the date of his/her

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.1696 of 2016(5) dt.21-02-2019 2/3

¶19

retirement even if he/she does not apply for final withdrawal within the period. In case the employee does not apply within six months of retirement, then the interest will be calculated from the day he/she applies for final withdrawal till the date of final payment of GPF amount.

¶20

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue regarding her termination was pending consideration before this Court and finally the same was decided after a long time on 5.5.2015. The petitioner has applied for withdrawal of GPF on 10.8.2015. He submits that the petitioner applied within six months of disposal of the pending proceedings so she would be entitled to GPF along with interest thereto.

¶21

In this case, petitioner’s termination is in the year 2001. She has not applied for final withdrawal within six months thereafter as per requirement of the Rules and circular taken note of. Thus, petitioner cannot claim any interest on the said amount of GPF and it would not be payable in terms of Rule position which has been cited in the counter affidavit.

¶22

In the earlier writ proceedings against order of termination no relief has been prayed for grant of interest on GPF even till the date of its adjudication, i.e., 05.05.2015.

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.1696 of 2016(5) dt.21-02-2019 3/3

¶24

In view of the aforesaid situation, claim of the petitioner for statutory interest uptodate on GPF amount is not payable to the petitioner.

¶25

Writ petition is disposed of .

¶26

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶27

Shashi

¶28

Nilam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhirendra Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sujeet Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nityanand Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Amit Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Radha Raman Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Girdhari Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.