Quashed

Yugal Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 May 2019CWJC/16592/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order addressed a writ petition challenging an arms licence rejection. The court held that rejecting the application solely due to lack of threat perception was unsustainable as the law permits up to three licences per family. The impugned orders were quashed and the matter remitted to the District Magistrate for a fresh decision within 60 days post-election.

What did the court decide?

The impugned orders rejecting the arms licence application are quashed. The matter is remitted to the District Magistrate to take a fresh decision within 60 days after the General Parliamentary Electi

Yugal Kishore Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16592 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Yugal Kishore Singh, Son of late Chandraket Singh Resident of VillageCharihara, P.S. Mashrak, District- Saran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Saran, Chapra.

¶10

The District Arms Magistrate, Saran, Chapra.

¶11

The Sub-Divisional officer, Marhowrah, District- Saran, Chapra.

¶12

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Marhowrah, District Saran.

¶13

The Police Inspector, Mashrak Police Station- District - Saran.

¶14

The Officer Incharge, Mashrak Police Station- District- Saran.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance :

¶18

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md.Nadeem Seraj -GP-5 Ms. Shalini, AC to GP-5

¶19

======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶21

4 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶22

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶23

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 7.1.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in Case No. 107 of 2014 and the order dated 18.8.2017 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Saran at Chapra in Arms Appeal No. 69 of 2016.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the application for grant of arms licence was rejected by the District Magistrate on two grounds, firstly, that one of the

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.16592 of 2017(4) dt.15-05-2019 2/3

¶26

family members is holding arms licence and, therefore, there is no need to grant arm licence to the petitioner, and secondly, that there is no threat perception for granting arms licence. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the appellate authority who declined to exercise jurisdiction vested in him as statutory appellate authority in most cavalier manner.

¶27

In the present case a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents which is most evasive. In para-7 thereof there is only reference that there is lack of threat perception as in the report of the S.P. there is no any specific indication of threat perception.

¶28

The court has noticed that application has been rejected on the ground of lack of threat perception and on the ground that one of the members of the family is holding licence. Such ground is unsustainable as the law permits three gun licences to a person.

¶29

Considering the aforesaid, the orders as contained in Annexures-8 and 15 are held to be unsustainable and, accordingly, they are quashed. The matter is remitted back to the District Magistrate to take a fresh decision in the light of observations made hereinabove within a maximum period of 60 days after the General Parliamentary Election.

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.16592 of 2017(4) dt.15-05-2019 3/3

¶31

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed

¶32

of.

¶33

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶34

spandey/- U

Yugal Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yugal Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Sri Badi Devi Ji Seva Samiti Dharamshala Trust and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shyam Nandan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Aman Raj

Abu Arshad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.